March 2011


Image via Wikipedia

I attended the British Property Federation briefing event on the Localism Bill with some co-conspirators this evening. Turley Associates (planning consultants), Birmingham City Council and PPS (public affairs) provided the speakers. Wragge & co were in charge of the rather nice canapés.

As Andrew Round from BCC commented, it’s difficult to philosophically argue with the localism cause. The UK, even after devolution, is far too centrally run and regulated. It’s also true that much of the Coalition Government’s localism policy leaves a little to be desired when it comes to the detail, not least in terms of the planning process.

I was, however, disappointed by the mood and tone of the event. Very negative and cynical. One might even suggest that the property and legal types don’t like the idea of change – and the impact it will have on their lives and businesses.

Localism is good and it’s happening. Not brilliant and pretty in parts, but the direction of travel is right.

The subject of LEPs inevitably reared its head. Inevitably too, there was much chuntering on the vagueness and LEPs boundaries, powers and budgets. Fine, they are another imperfect policy.

Continues…


The almost universal disdain for the government’s enthusiasm for elected mayors amongst those most directly effected is crisply summarised by INLOGOV’s visiting lecturer.

He writes:

“Of the current leaders of the ‘Big 12′ cities, 8 are Labour, 3 Liberal Democrat, and 1 Conservative. Their views and particular concerns vary, as does the intemperance of their language. But, apart from Leicester, who are bypassing the Bill’s procedures and electing their mayor this May, support for mayors even as political, let alone managerial, leaders of their authorities is pretty well zero.”

Read the whole post here: http://www.inlogov.bham.ac.uk/News/2011/03/elected-mayors.shtml

  • Chamber Tweets

  • Published by

    .

  • Subscribe

  • Weekly bulletins

 
%d bloggers like this: