<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ofsted&#8217;s savage attack on Birmingham likely to dent investor confidence, business chiefs warn</title>
	<atom:link href="/ofsteds-savage-attack-on-birmingham-likely-to-dent-investor-confidence-business-chiefs-warn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/ofsteds-savage-attack-on-birmingham-likely-to-dent-investor-confidence-business-chiefs-warn/</link>
	<description>Politics, LEPs and economic development in the West Midlands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:41:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GBSLEP</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/ofsteds-savage-attack-on-birmingham-likely-to-dent-investor-confidence-business-chiefs-warn/#comment-6583</link>
		<dc:creator>GBSLEP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=12001#comment-6583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From @ChamberlainFile - business leaders fight back against Birmingham criticism. http://t.co/USBGzUTKcp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From @ChamberlainFile &#8211; business leaders fight back against Birmingham criticism. <a href="http://t.co/USBGzUTKcp" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/USBGzUTKcp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulmdale</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/ofsteds-savage-attack-on-birmingham-likely-to-dent-investor-confidence-business-chiefs-warn/#comment-6584</link>
		<dc:creator>paulmdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=12001#comment-6584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Business leaders hit back over Ofsted&#039;s &#039;savage&#039; attack on Birmingham @ChamberlainFile http://t.co/1CjTlF2IQF]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business leaders hit back over Ofsted&#8217;s &#8216;savage&#8217; attack on Birmingham @ChamberlainFile <a href="http://t.co/1CjTlF2IQF" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/1CjTlF2IQF</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/ofsteds-savage-attack-on-birmingham-likely-to-dent-investor-confidence-business-chiefs-warn/#comment-6580</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=12001#comment-6580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The effect of Sir Michael&#039;s speech, when he turned to the economy, was to prick the bubble of &quot;spin&quot; that invariably surrounds discussion of the local, city and regional economy. It is not what he said, rather that he actually said something different.

I cannot for a moment think that his remarks will impact business confidence, let alone a prospective investor will be deterred. Are those people tuned into what OFSTED say? Is the appalling state of B&#039;ham social services a factor in making an investment? No.

If such luminaries really think that B&#039;ham has 45,000 unemployed, based on government statistics, then it is they who have &quot;lost the plot&quot;. B&#039;ham is struggling to climb out of a recession - which hit the region harder than other places.

Let Sir Michael come to New Street Station, a much lauded infrastructure project and gaze upon the new station concourse. Nice, if somewhat bland. Has this investment changed how much traffic the station can take, improved capacity? No.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The effect of Sir Michael&#8217;s speech, when he turned to the economy, was to prick the bubble of &#8220;spin&#8221; that invariably surrounds discussion of the local, city and regional economy. It is not what he said, rather that he actually said something different.</p>
<p>I cannot for a moment think that his remarks will impact business confidence, let alone a prospective investor will be deterred. Are those people tuned into what OFSTED say? Is the appalling state of B&#8217;ham social services a factor in making an investment? No.</p>
<p>If such luminaries really think that B&#8217;ham has 45,000 unemployed, based on government statistics, then it is they who have &#8220;lost the plot&#8221;. B&#8217;ham is struggling to climb out of a recession &#8211; which hit the region harder than other places.</p>
<p>Let Sir Michael come to New Street Station, a much lauded infrastructure project and gaze upon the new station concourse. Nice, if somewhat bland. Has this investment changed how much traffic the station can take, improved capacity? No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrewJ46</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/ofsteds-savage-attack-on-birmingham-likely-to-dent-investor-confidence-business-chiefs-warn/#comment-6579</link>
		<dc:creator>andrewJ46</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=12001#comment-6579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@RichardBurdenMP Hi Richard did you see this http://t.co/NtWCyvntXQ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@RichardBurdenMP Hi Richard did you see this <a href="http://t.co/NtWCyvntXQ" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/NtWCyvntXQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
