<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pay deal for top Birmingham councillors a &#8216;political minefield&#8217; in austerity Britain</title>
	<atom:link href="/pay-deal-for-top-birmingham-councillors-a-political-minefield-in-austerity-britain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/pay-deal-for-top-birmingham-councillors-a-political-minefield-in-austerity-britain/</link>
	<description>Politics, LEPs and economic development in the West Midlands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:11:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: james hutchings</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/pay-deal-for-top-birmingham-councillors-a-political-minefield-in-austerity-britain/#comment-6849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james hutchings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 23:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=11994#comment-6849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too many allowances and some too large]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many allowances and some too large</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Game</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/pay-deal-for-top-birmingham-councillors-a-political-minefield-in-austerity-britain/#comment-6581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Game]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=11994#comment-6581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting blog, Paul - especially the bit about the allowances structure having to change to reflect a smaller council. The actual quote came, I think, from Ms Cooper&#039;s 2010-11 report, not the most recent one, but either way it would have been looking forward to the May 2012 Mayoral referendum, and what could have been a dramatic change in the whole operation of the Council. Is your blog suggesting the 120-member size of the Council is still a live issue? If so, I think we should be told!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting blog, Paul &#8211; especially the bit about the allowances structure having to change to reflect a smaller council. The actual quote came, I think, from Ms Cooper&#8217;s 2010-11 report, not the most recent one, but either way it would have been looking forward to the May 2012 Mayoral referendum, and what could have been a dramatic change in the whole operation of the Council. Is your blog suggesting the 120-member size of the Council is still a live issue? If so, I think we should be told!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulmdale</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/pay-deal-for-top-birmingham-councillors-a-political-minefield-in-austerity-britain/#comment-6570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paulmdale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=11994#comment-6570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;Root and branch&#039; review of pay for top Birmingham councillors is taking an awfully long time @ChamberlainFile http://t.co/xBEYSU6SIE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Root and branch&#8217; review of pay for top Birmingham councillors is taking an awfully long time @ChamberlainFile <a href="http://t.co/xBEYSU6SIE" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/xBEYSU6SIE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
