<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sir Albert&#8217;s top team: who&#8217;s in, and who&#8217;s out?</title>
	<atom:link href="/sir-alberts-top-team-whos-in-and-whos-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sir-alberts-top-team-whos-in-and-whos-out/</link>
	<description>Politics, LEPs and economic development in the West Midlands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chamberlain Files</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sir-alberts-top-team-whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Chamberlain Files]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 09:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=2816#comment-665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Sir Albert&#8217;s top team: who&#8217;s in, and who&#8217;s out? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sir Albert&#8217;s top team: who&#8217;s in, and who&#8217;s out? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Fisher</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sir-alberts-top-team-whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominic Fisher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=2816#comment-663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you seen the list? It&#039;s a Comedy Cabinet. Chaos ahead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the list? It&#8217;s a Comedy Cabinet. Chaos ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Tis the season to be &#8230; (insert your mood)&#8221; &#171; The Young Turk</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sir-alberts-top-team-whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8220;Tis the season to be &#8230; (insert your mood)&#8221; &#171; The Young Turk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=2816#comment-614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] years, as they can&#8217;t lose enough seats to swing back to either of the other parties. Yet the speculation is abounding over who will fill the new cabinet posts, especially as the previous 10 roles have been reduced to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] years, as they can&#8217;t lose enough seats to swing back to either of the other parties. Yet the speculation is abounding over who will fill the new cabinet posts, especially as the previous 10 roles have been reduced to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sir-alberts-top-team-whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=2816#comment-607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a nice idea that a Labour leader might appoint Tory or Lib Dem Councillors to the Cabinet but over 50% of those voting last week voted Labour. How on earth would you explain to ordinary people that you had decided to let the losing parties make the executive decisions?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a nice idea that a Labour leader might appoint Tory or Lib Dem Councillors to the Cabinet but over 50% of those voting last week voted Labour. How on earth would you explain to ordinary people that you had decided to let the losing parties make the executive decisions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbancomms</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sir-alberts-top-team-whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[urbancomms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 17:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=2816#comment-604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RT @ChamberlainFile: Sir Albert&#039;s top team: who&#039;s in, and who&#039;s out?: By @paulmdale http://t.co/6rEKmcXj]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @ChamberlainFile: Sir Albert&#8217;s top team: who&#8217;s in, and who&#8217;s out?: By @paulmdale <a href="http://t.co/6rEKmcXj" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/6rEKmcXj</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Mirza Ahmad LLD</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sir-alberts-top-team-whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr Mirza Ahmad LLD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 15:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=2816#comment-596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No surprises... A stitch up for party political supporters, with the &quot;best people&quot; for the jobs not even being considered.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprises&#8230; A stitch up for party political supporters, with the &#8220;best people&#8221; for the jobs not even being considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Najma Hafeez</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sir-alberts-top-team-whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Najma Hafeez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=2816#comment-594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Involving those with the title of &quot;Alderman&quot;, is an excellent idea.  Their experience of policy implementation, and especially their experience of dealing with full time Council Officers (who are not always agreeable or supportive of Labour Party policy) would be extremely useful, especially for inexperienced or new members.  
Albert should take this suggestion seriously.
PS I dont envy him his new job, allocating the few available positions to the great majority we have!!
Good luck Albert!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Involving those with the title of &#8220;Alderman&#8221;, is an excellent idea.  Their experience of policy implementation, and especially their experience of dealing with full time Council Officers (who are not always agreeable or supportive of Labour Party policy) would be extremely useful, especially for inexperienced or new members.<br />
Albert should take this suggestion seriously.<br />
PS I dont envy him his new job, allocating the few available positions to the great majority we have!!<br />
Good luck Albert!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulgslatter</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sir-alberts-top-team-whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paulgslatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=2816#comment-595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Dale&#039;s analysis of Albert Bore&#039;s Cabinet hopes http://t.co/AEWP58hx &lt; I wonder about opportunities for councillors outside the Cabinet?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Dale&#8217;s analysis of Albert Bore&#8217;s Cabinet hopes <a href="http://t.co/AEWP58hx" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/AEWP58hx</a> &lt; I wonder about opportunities for councillors outside the Cabinet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulgslatter</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sir-alberts-top-team-whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paulgslatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 12:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=2816#comment-592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Appointing Cabinet positions that cross departmental silos is welcome, though it could, in practice, lead to disjuncture between the Council&#039;s political and officer leadership.

This, and the reduction in the number of Cabinet posts, could present an opportunity to involve more councillors in executive positions oustide the Cabinet.  To some extent, this will happen anyway if Labour goes ahead with the plan to develop the role of District Committee Chairs.  But, is there any reason why we can&#039;t have political heads of Council Directorates outside the Cabinet?

Overview and Scrutiny could be transformed for the better by involving non-councillors in joint collaborative enquiries into areas of future policy.  Could we have a committee of councillors and non-councillors taking time to look properly into, for example, long-term economic growth and skills, or the potential for neighbourhood councils?  This kind of considered and inclusive approach might contribute to the intelligence with which the Council works - and give councillors important jobs to do with some real outcomes for the city.

Finally, we&#039;ve suggested informally that the Council could look at the almost obsolete role and title of Alderman.  Honorary aldermen (women and men with expertise and insight to offer) could be appointed to form a  reference group for the Council and to come up with well thought out ideas for the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appointing Cabinet positions that cross departmental silos is welcome, though it could, in practice, lead to disjuncture between the Council&#8217;s political and officer leadership.</p>
<p>This, and the reduction in the number of Cabinet posts, could present an opportunity to involve more councillors in executive positions oustide the Cabinet.  To some extent, this will happen anyway if Labour goes ahead with the plan to develop the role of District Committee Chairs.  But, is there any reason why we can&#8217;t have political heads of Council Directorates outside the Cabinet?</p>
<p>Overview and Scrutiny could be transformed for the better by involving non-councillors in joint collaborative enquiries into areas of future policy.  Could we have a committee of councillors and non-councillors taking time to look properly into, for example, long-term economic growth and skills, or the potential for neighbourhood councils?  This kind of considered and inclusive approach might contribute to the intelligence with which the Council works &#8211; and give councillors important jobs to do with some real outcomes for the city.</p>
<p>Finally, we&#8217;ve suggested informally that the Council could look at the almost obsolete role and title of Alderman.  Honorary aldermen (women and men with expertise and insight to offer) could be appointed to form a  reference group for the Council and to come up with well thought out ideas for the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbancomms</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sir-alberts-top-team-whos-in-and-whos-out/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[urbancomms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 11:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=2816#comment-591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@paulmdale analysis on @ChamberlainFile of Labour&#039;s new BCC Cabinet, including how Leisure will work http://t.co/vrDKNtCQ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@paulmdale analysis on @ChamberlainFile of Labour&#8217;s new BCC Cabinet, including how Leisure will work <a href="http://t.co/vrDKNtCQ" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/vrDKNtCQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
