<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorry, Councillor, you’re the one who looks deceitful</title>
	<atom:link href="/sorry-councillor-youre-the-one-who-looks-deceitful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sorry-councillor-youre-the-one-who-looks-deceitful/</link>
	<description>Politics, LEPs and economic development in the West Midlands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:51:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cllr Fergus Robinson</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sorry-councillor-youre-the-one-who-looks-deceitful/#comment-6391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cllr Fergus Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 11:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=11752#comment-6391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, Mr Game - in accusing Cllr Hutchings of deceit, you are practising exactly that.  You are utterly failing to compare like with like.  The known grant income at the start of each year has to be compared, not the outturn of one year with the starting point of the next.  There are ALWAYS additional grants received during the year (indeed the Council has already received some this year) that are not known about at the start of the year, so Cllr Hutchings comparison is valid, and yours is not.

Furthermore, even if we take the 1.044bn outturn against the 1.042bn projection, as you wish to, that also completely fails to demonstrate the &quot;falling off a cliff&quot; scenario that Albert Bore wants it to.  It&#039;s a fall of £1.8m, or 0.17%, an insignificant change.  The real question should be why the &quot;jaws of doom&quot; show a completely different situation?  Part of the answer appears to be double-counting in the top and bottom jaws.  Deceit, surely, if true, and whose deceit would that be, I wonder?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Mr Game &#8211; in accusing Cllr Hutchings of deceit, you are practising exactly that.  You are utterly failing to compare like with like.  The known grant income at the start of each year has to be compared, not the outturn of one year with the starting point of the next.  There are ALWAYS additional grants received during the year (indeed the Council has already received some this year) that are not known about at the start of the year, so Cllr Hutchings comparison is valid, and yours is not.</p>
<p>Furthermore, even if we take the 1.044bn outturn against the 1.042bn projection, as you wish to, that also completely fails to demonstrate the &#8220;falling off a cliff&#8221; scenario that Albert Bore wants it to.  It&#8217;s a fall of £1.8m, or 0.17%, an insignificant change.  The real question should be why the &#8220;jaws of doom&#8221; show a completely different situation?  Part of the answer appears to be double-counting in the top and bottom jaws.  Deceit, surely, if true, and whose deceit would that be, I wonder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EconinBrum</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sorry-councillor-youre-the-one-who-looks-deceitful/#comment-6378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EconinBrum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=11752#comment-6378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ChamberlainFile Once u understand that Tories use the Newspeak language it&#039;s quite clear.Their sentences mean the opposite of what they say]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ChamberlainFile Once u understand that Tories use the Newspeak language it&#8217;s quite clear.Their sentences mean the opposite of what they say</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosi edwards</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sorry-councillor-youre-the-one-who-looks-deceitful/#comment-6351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rosi edwards]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=11752#comment-6351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Helpful explanation, Chris. Unfortunately Albert is starting to be viewed as a Cassandra - she was always right in her prophecies about Troy, but never believed and they weren&#039;t acted on. Let&#039;s hope this article will help people to listen, reflect, and respond appropriately.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helpful explanation, Chris. Unfortunately Albert is starting to be viewed as a Cassandra &#8211; she was always right in her prophecies about Troy, but never believed and they weren&#8217;t acted on. Let&#8217;s hope this article will help people to listen, reflect, and respond appropriately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgbailey</title>
		<link>https://thechamberlainfiles.com/sorry-councillor-youre-the-one-who-looks-deceitful/#comment-6340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dgbailey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 21:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thechamberlainfiles.com/?p=11752#comment-6340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, Councillor, you’re the one who looks deceitful http://t.co/SOnez3ZYIf  via @@chamberlainfile]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Councillor, you’re the one who looks deceitful <a href="http://t.co/SOnez3ZYIf" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/SOnez3ZYIf</a>  via @@chamberlainfile</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
