Opinion

The European Elections – a Silly Season Story, Part 2

Chris Game calls the start of the silly season for The Chamberlain News

A stock image:  just to prove silly season is in full swing.

It’s rarely precisely defined, but we can all recognise it when it arrives – that Augusty time, characterized by exaggerated news stories about frivolous matters for want of real news. Yes, the silly season – and while European Parliament elections aren’t exactly frivolous matters, at nearly a year’s distance they’re hardly hot news, and, even when they do happen, they’ll deploy an electoral system as sensible and comprehensible to most of us as cricket’s Duckworth-Lewis method.

So congratulations to Benjamin Mulvihill for opening the Chamberlain News’ silly season with his examination of the West Midlands ‘runners and riders’ in next June’s elections for the Strasbourg Parliament.

In truth, though, Benjamin’s piece was disappointingly short on serious silliness, being instead a rather informed summary of the electoral process, the candidate lists selected by the leading political parties, including UKIP, and a reasoned evaluation of those candidates’ chances. 

Continues…

A woman for Warley

After nearly 100 years of women’s suffrage could Warley at last be preparing for its first woman MP?

John Spellar

A few days ago our branch Labour Party formally endorsed John Spellar as our choice to be Labour’s candidate for Warley at the next General Election.

However we also overwhelmingly passed a resolution suggesting that when John finally stands down Warley Labour Party should volunteer to have an all-women’s shortlist (AWS) from which to choose our next parliamentary candidate. This is a device the party has chosen to increase the representation of women in parliament and in a future Labour government.

Choosing those seats which have AWS can sometimes be a fraught issue within the Labour Party. Every aspiring Labour politician dreams of having a “safe” seat from which to launch a political career that may propel him into ministerial office and possibly the cabinet. But when people suggest that a candidate for a safe seat should be a “her” all sorts of representations and objections are made.

Continues…

EDL made presence known but it was soon business as usual on Broad Street

Mike Olley: the EDL march was unpleasant but Broad Street and free speech are booming

The English Defence League (EDL) in claiming to be “not racist, not violent and no longer silent” are certainly right inasmuch as they get one out of three. Whatever the merits of that conundrum they certainly know how to mess up a city centre even be it for a few hours as they did on Saturday 20th July. Yet what was the effect on trade on Broad Street?

One of the big problems of the EDL protesting anywhere is the type of people they attract. Be it football hooligans, Unite Against Fascism (UAF) or any like minded fellow travellers. Put bluntly they are all as disruptive as one another. The EDL announced they would be assembling in Centenary Square. Some representing the UAF encouraged their supporters to assemble opposite outside the House of Sport. Had the UAF so assembled, numerous of their supporters could have been severely injured if not killed. As it was, the Police had to physically fight (with shield and baton) valiantly to protect the UAF protestors. Without the Police there could have been carnage and the UAF could have suffered.

That of course is a well considered theory. What is fact, is that wherever the EDL protest the City or Town centre concerned loses out. Broad Street seems to be visited every six months or so by EDL type protests. It’s not pleasant but we do live in a democracy. If I and a few chums want to stand outside the Council House and shout the Queen down, we are free to do so. Long may that be so. Equally if ardent royalists wish to stand nearby to oppose our treachery they can. Long may this be the case also. Irrespective of the EDL’s message, they have a right to speak out. As do the UAF et al.

Continues…

Birmingham’s bad image: how to solve our second-rate status

Philip Parkin on the lessons learnt from Birmingham's poor poll rating

Have you seen the ? Don’t worry if you haven’t, you already know what’s in it. We’re second rate for pretty much everything it seems: bottom of the league, or thereabouts, for nightlife, culture, architecture, music, sport, even for how we dress which is a new one on me. And the accent of course, that goes without saying. I’ve seen so many of these surveys over the years that they don’t wind me up anymore – they make me mildly irritated rather than downright annoyed – however, what, if anything should we learn from them?

If we want people to see us as the second most important city in the country, then a good place to start would be in how we respond to these perennial ‘Birmingham is second rate’ surveys. The more we complain about this sort of thing, the more Marketing Birmingham come out with comments in mitigation like ‘well, our food offer has been praised by the New York Times’, the more it looks like we care, and the more we look like bad losers. Throwing lots of statistics back in reply – ’33.8 million tourists last year’, ‘105,000 visitors to the cricket’ – won’t make the blindest bit of difference. We’re talking about people’s perceptions.

The CBSO and Birmingham Royal Ballet are exceptional, well respected institutions that do a huge amount of good for the city but please, let’s stop pinning our cultural ‘offer’ on them. I’m not convinced that they particularly reflect the diversity, and age profile of our city anyway – two of the things that we really do have going for us – and it’s encouraging that more marketing is now being done around the ‘New Beat Generation’ group of younger, noisier artists and musicians. I’ve got form with regards to continually banging on about this sort of thing but everyone of my generation will remember how Manchester briefly became the coolest city in the planet in the late ‘80s/early ‘90s on the back of its music scene.

Let’s get behind the Birmingham Big Art Project and its proposal to create an iconic piece of public art for the city, and let’s get it right. The High Line Project in New York, a public park built on an historic rail freight line high above the streets of Manhattan’s West Side, is now on any discerning tourist’s ‘to do’ list and could work brilliantly in Birmingham. The artwork along the route is constantly changing and is consequently a much safer bet than funding a single, very expensive, piece of art which, let’s face it, many of us would probably end up moaning about.

I think the case for HS2 is getting weaker all the time. Even the head of the CBI thinks that the money could be put to better use. A proper, integrated local transport system would be much more beneficial to people living and working in this city. A train network that could get people from say, Sutton Coldfield to Moseley, would be a start. Or from Digbeth to the Jewellery Quarter.

It’s people that make great cities, not buildings. It’s great news that Birmingham is getting a new public library at a time when many around the country are closing down, and the photos of it will certainly look good on the marketing material, but I’m not convinced that it’ll bring people into the city, or, more crucially, help keep people here. The hard slog of improving our schools, getting people into work, and making it safe and easy for people to get around will not only improve everybody’s quality of life, it will also encourage graduates to stay here and put down roots.

If we want to improve people’s perceptions of this city, then, we need to act with a bit more self-belief, widen our cultural offer, invest in the arts and give people plenty of reasons to want to stay here. Get these things right and the only surveys that’ll be left to irritate us will be the ones that rate our accent.

What’s particularly frustrating, however, is that you probably wouldn’t be able to find a room big enough to accommodate the people at the head of all the organisations responsible for these areas of public life.

Wouldn’t it be useful if we had a single person, accountable to the residents of Birmingham, and with the democratic clout to bring together the marketing people, business groups and cultural organisations? Who could confidently shrug off the next ‘second rate Birmingham’ survey that heads our way and tell the media, on our behalf, that we’re too busy building a great city, thank you, to respond to the same, boring criticisms that we’ve heard a hundred times before? Who could put the case, perhaps, for how he, or she, would tackle the city’s ‘image problem’ to residents prior to an election and give us all the opportunity to debate the issue?

Does the leader of the city council, voted into his position by his councillor colleagues every twelve months, have that democratic mandate? Or is it about now that we start kicking ourselves for not voting for a mayor?

Philip Parkin is the Conservative councillor for Sutton Trinity Ward and former deputy leader of the Conservative Group. His interests are in the regeneration, cultural offer and reputation of Birmingham.

Blog:

Twitter: 

Cover Image: Victoria Square – Jas Sansi,

You take Manhattan

Michael Loftus challenges the claim Birmingham is more expensive than New York

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Paul Dale has a hard earned and richly deserved reputation as an indefatigable teller of truth unto power. In a previous existence, when one of my tasks was to artlessly gild the Birmingham lily, I was often stopped in my tracks as I dreamed up some extravagance by reflecting on the scorn and ridicule that Paul might well heap upon it once it slid into the public domain.

I fear however that with one his recent pieces he has fallen into that mind set that insists if there is a bad thing to say about Birmingham, then the only honourable response is to repeat and bandy it about as freely as possible.

The issue here is a line buried deep in a report by the Centre for Cities that says that it is more expensive to acquire office space in Birmingham than in Manhattan. Paul Dale has picked this up and made rather a lot of it. The Dale piece goes on to conclude that it is cheaper to start up a business there than here – which is less stretching the point perhaps than to subject it to fairly extreme aerobics, Mr Dale acknowledges that the data that all this is based on dates from nearly ten years ago but rather baldly and blandly asserts that there is no evidence that the findings have changed significantly. Well, we’ll come back to that, shall we?

Continues…

  • Chamber Tweets

  • Published by

    .

  • Subscribe

  • Weekly bulletins

 
%d bloggers like this: