Your Region, Your Choice: Missed opportunity?
With the Government’ s failure to deliver the fabled Single Pot of joined up local spending for the greater Birmingham economy, LEP chair Andy Street is no doubt crying into his Waitrose Fair Trade skinny Latte. Mr Street has been taken for a ride by George Osborne et al, his good nature preyed upon by the big beasts of Westminster. But the paltry national £2billion announced by Treasury tune-master George ‘Jeffrey’ Osborne for Single Pot working is not at all surprising.
Those expecting a massive £50 billion shift of resources to localities were simply not paying attention. A trench war over business support and regeneration is raging in the Coalition Government.
Business minister Vince Cable was not likely to roll over and hand control of a good chunk of his department’s role to LEPs. And his reason was not just about keepingTreasury tanks off his lawn. Mr Cable always had a point when he said – and he said it often – that Local Economic Partnerships were simply not accountable enough to be given large amounts of Government dosh. The deflating of the Single Pot advocates is equally unsurprising when we recall that even Lord Heseltine, that arch advocate of local based regeneration quangos, said the same.
None of this invalidates the arguments of Sir Albert Bore about the need to more local and joined up control of budgets. Unfortunately, as a canny politician like Albert knows, Governments of all colours have proved unwilling to trust local councils with the necessary cash. And after George Osborne’s recent and continuing cuts bonanza, this Government above all is not about to give any additional powers (or cash) to local government.
LEP in the dark: Your Region, Your Choice: Missed opportunity? #sr2013 #suttoncoldfield @gbslep
@ChamberlainFile So I guess that’s the end of Bore’s vision of ‘best transport network in Europe in 10 years’ @paulmdale @neilelkes #bcc
No to time travel, yes to creating a body answerable locally but legally able to plan and execute the big investment in regeneration and transport we need in the West Midlands. That’s exactly what the old WM County Council did. It was no talking shop. If you use the Midland Metro or drive down the Black Country Route you’re benefiting from major projects planned and executed by the WM County Council in the 70s & 80s. The point is that no one borough could block these County projects and that’s why they happened. The County was – like the London Mayor & GLA today – able to act strategically. We need to restore that ability to the West Midlands conurbation at least.
As for the Regional Assembly that had no such powers but had the merit of creating a genuine partnership across both shire and urban areas in the wider region, plus bringing in dialogue with business, voluntary sector, faith groups,unions and the wider community. The Labour Government made the mistake of not allowing the region to decide to keep what was by then a forum with wide and cross-party support. It was no substitute for an elected body like London’s regional government (or the WM County Council) but where now can a genuine regional conversation be held between different parts of society? Wherever we live in the West Midlands our voice to Government is the weaker for the loss of this while London has a loud and unified regional voice for its interests. Are we content to be a powerless province instead of an empowered region?
Cllr Phil Davies on ‘LEP in the dark’ @TheChamberlainFiles well worth a read: https://thechamberlainfiles.com/lep-in-the-dark/9342
‘LEP in the dark’ by Cllr Phil Davies worth a read at @The Chamberlain News: via
Phil Davis may wish to time travel back to 1986, to those glorious days of an elected West Midlands County Council. Were those councils really effective or yet another “talking shop”? Let alone the ‘Regional assembly’, a body with almost no public profile during its life.
It is a fact that the central government for England has steadily reduced the powers and responsibilities of local government for many years, even before 1986 and under both main political parties. Indeed one could argue that local government will soon be a ‘rump’, with little money, fewer staff and bodies like the LEP advocating they should “run the show”.
Nevertheless the LEP might get £110m to spend every year (including EU funds) …so it is far from being disastrous
RT @ChamberlainFile: LEP in the dark >> some light weekend reading for those who simply can’t get enough LEP news