
Osborne’s £ 2 billion was less than expected.
It’s difficult not to acquire a sense that whatever situation Andy Street finds himself in, he will always see the bright side. No doubt he’s a demanding boss for his fellow employee-owners at John Lewis, but he must also be an incredibly motivating leader. Eternal optimists can distort reality, set unattainable objectives and create futile strategies, but in a city region historically seen as a bunch of whingers in the vicinity of Downing Street, Andy Street is an indubitable asset.
Even for Street, stepping up to the podium a few minutes after the Chancellor revealed a piddling £2Bn would be available across the country for the Single Local Growth Fund must have been tough. As I’d predicted, the chairman of the Greater Birmingham and Solihull Enterprise Partnership (GBSLEP) remained characteristically upbeat. His message seemed to be ‘yes, we are disappointed but it’s a start and we’re already beginning to deliver the principles of No Stone Unturned and the Greater Birmingham Project on the ground.’ His positive outlook even rubbed off on Birmingham City Council leader Sir Albert Bore by the time he stepped up to round off the LEP’s annual conference. Albert is not normally given to sunny dispositions or refusing to make political capital.
Whatever positive spin Street, Bore and others apply to the Spending Review and Single Pot, it is a far cry from Lord Heseltine’s vision of handing over circa £50Bn (over four years) from Whitehall to local and free delivery. Less of a pot, more of a thimble.
Centre for Cities, the respected urban think tank, had argued for £5Bn and suggested £3Bn was at the very bottom of the range. So £2Bn is a disappointment and, as the argues, “it’s hardly a ringing endorsement for devolution to local areas.” Alex Jones added: “the worry is that Whitehall could require places to jump through a lot of hoops in order to access relatively small amounts; hardly a localised process.”
, the most important response to Hezza’s report was always going to be from within Whitehall. Yesterday’s announcement effectively confirms that the resistance of Treasury and BIS officials won the day.
Never knowingly undone @ChamberlainFile response to #SR2013 from @urbancomms
£220m EU funding allocated to GBS LEP
#GBSLEP Street stays upbeat despite #csr13 #singlepot disappointment via @The Chamberlain News
@dgbailey your name pops up on @ChamberlainFile too…
@urbancomms @dgbailey @chamberlainfile I was really impressed by Andy Street’s measured, positive response to yesterday’s disappointing news
@AlexJonesCities you were mentioned in dispatches @CentreforCities
Gutted I didn’t think of the thimble line RT @ChamberlainFile LEP leaders stay upbeat as pot turns to thimble #GBSLEP
@graeme_brown our finest sub-editors were at work all night on that one
@ChamberlainFile
This is not good but nor is it bad. £2bn pa – could mean that the Greater Birmingham and Solihull LEP get circa £80m pa. Which is really significant to be honest. The crucial issue will be; how much is already tied up in decisions already made and what strings there will be attached to the resources. If it is very constrained it will be just like a local delivery of a national programme and of less benefit. It will be very much down to the LEP to show it can spend the money and LEPs that do will gain more I am sure over time. I am working on the European Funding strategy for the LEP and we will if we are lucky get circa £30m pa from that source. So a combined sum of £110m pa is potentially very useful. We need to use these resources wisely!
Ahead of infrastructure statement, my take on yesterday’s Single Pot news and the @GBSLEP annual conference
RT @urbancomms @ChamberlainFile: Never knowingly undone: LEP leaders stay upbeat as pot turns to thimble #SR2013 –